During prolonged economic recessions when the normal cyclical expansion of output fails to materialize, the topic of the 'cyclical behaviour of wages' has emerged as an area of debate. In 1985, the British Treasury claimed that academic studies into the cyclical behaviour of wages demonstrated that a cut in wages would increase employment. Wages in the Business Cycle contests this argument by presenting the results of original, empirical work which illustrates the absence of any systematic empirical regularity to wage movements over the business cycle.
Jonathan Michie argues that the re-emergence of this debate must be seen within the context of the theory of the 'labour demand function', representing an attempt to challenge the Keynesian theoretical assumptions implicit in the bulk of applied macro economic work up to the late 1970s.
Autorentext
Jonathan Michie is Professor of Innovation & Knowledge Exchange at the University of Oxford, UK, where he is also President of Kellogg College.
Inhalt
1. Introduction
2. The Theoretical Background
3. A Survey of the Literature
4. International Results
5. Employment
6. Phases of the Cycle
7. Individual Industries and the Aggregate Economy
8. The History of the Cyclical Wage Debate
9. Conclusion
Appendix 1: Using Alternative Price Deflators
Appendix 2: Construction of Total Direct Cost Index
Appendix 3: Statistical Tests
Appendix 4: Data
Appendix 5: The Phase Average Trend Technique
Appendix 6: Seasonal Adjustment
Bibliography
Author Index
Subject Index