A Sociology of Crime has an outstanding reputation for its distinctive and systematic contribution to the criminological literature. Through detailed examples and analysis, it shows how crime is a product of processes of criminalisation constituted through the interactional and organizational use of language.
In this welcome second edition, the book reviews and evaluates the current state of criminological theory from this "grammatical" perspective. It maintains and develops its critical and subversive stance but greatly widens its theoretical range, including dedicated chapters on gender, race, class and the post-als including postcolonialism. It now also provides questions, exercises and further readings alongside its detailed analysis of a set of international examples, both classical and contemporary.
Autorentext
Stephen Hester was Professor of Sociology at Bangor University, UK. He retired in 2009 but continued to be active in ethnomethodological and conversation-analytic research. He authored, co-authored or co-edited eight books and over forty articles and book chapters, notably An Invitation to Ethnomethodology and Orders of Ordinary Action, both with David Francis, and Descriptions of Deviance, a book on membership categorization analysis left unfinished at his untimely death in April 2014.
Peter Eglin is Professor Emeritus of Sociology at Wilfrid Laurier University in Canada. He has been Humboldt Research Fellow at the Universität Konstanz and Visiting Research Associate at the Centre for Socio-Legal Studies at Wolfson College, Oxford. As a visiting professor he has taught at the University of Toronto, Northumbria University and Bangor University. His work has been translated into French, Italian, Spanish and Japanese. He has contributed chapters to the Handbook of Sociology and Human Rights (2013) and the Routledge Handbook of Language and Culture (2014). He wrote extensively with Stephen Hester, including the monograph The Montreal Massacre.
Zusammenfassung
Qu'est-ce que l'air en droit ? La réponse à cette question conduit à qualifier cette ressource naturelle vitale en identifiant son statut juridique, dans une approche fonctionnelle faisant écho à son rôle écosystémique. Elle s'attache à considérer les enjeux juridiques qui découlent des multiples utilisations de l'air, en distinguant ses divers aspects : le volume atmosphérique, l'air-matière et la force éolienne. L'analyse du droit positif mène au constat que l'air est une chose commune. La présente thèse s'attache dès lors à construire une théorie moderne des « communs ». En droit interne, l'air est tour à tour envisagé en tant que non-chose commune, domaine public naturel et objet d'un statut sui generis. En droit international, l'attention est portée sur les concepts de patrimoine commun et de préoccupation commune de l'humanité. La recherche s'achève sur l'examen du cadre légal et des principes juridiques applicables à la régulation des droits d'usage de l'air, afin d'en préserver durablement le caractère commun et le noyau « intangible ».
Inhalt
1. Sociology
Part I: Positively UndertakenIntroduction
2. State
3. Society
Part II: Interpretatively Turned
Introduction
4. Claims-Making
5. Defining the Situation
6. Practical Reasoning
Part III: Politically Challenged
Introduction
7. Class
8. Gender
9. Race
Part IV: Epistemically UnderminedIntroduction
10. Power
11. People?
12: Conclusion